We are going to take a journey through history to uncover the deep connections between the biblical prophecy outlined in the Book of Revelation and the power structures that have shaped our world. From the time of Yeshua, or Jesus, to the unfolding drama in our modern era, we’ll see how ancient prophecies are coming to pass, showing how the powers that were, are, and will be continue to follow a destructive and oppressive course, with Rome’s influence present behind it all. We’ll explore the rise and fall of empires, the journey of Israel, and the role of modern-day powers in fulfilling the final prophecy in Revelation.
Let’s take a walk back in time.
In the days of Yeshua’s ministry when he walked this earth, the Roman Empire had taken control of Judea, the land of the children of Israel. Judea was now under imperial rule, but this didn’t just mean political control; it also affected the religious landscape. The Herodian dynasty—an appointed, puppet ruling family under Rome’s authority—governed over Judaea. This family had aligned themselves closely with the Roman Empire and was directly responsible for ensuring the Judaeans remained subservient to Roman law.
At the same time, the Sanhedrin, the Jewish council, was compromised. While the Sanhedrin had religious authority, it was heavily influenced and infiltrated by the Roman-backed Herodians. The tension between the religious teachings of Yeshua and the Roman-backed religious authorities were diametrically opposed. Yeshua’s message of a coming Kingdom—one that would be free from both Roman oppression and the corrupted leadership of the Sanhedrin—was a direct threat to the power structures in place.
Yeshua’s message of the coming kingdom, one that will be built on righteousness and justice, went against the Roman-controlled religious authorities, who feared losing their positions of power. The Herodian Sanhedrin saw Yeshua’s message of liberation as dangerous, and so, they orchestrated His death, fearing that a rebellion might break out among the people. They were afraid that Yeshua’s teachings would lead the people to rise up against Rome, which would bring about Roman military retaliation and likely destroy their privileged position.
After Yeshua’s crucifixion and resurrection, His disciples began spreading His teachings across the ancient world, to the lost tribes of Israel scattered in places like Asia Minor and beyond. We have reference of this dispersal through the letter of James to the twelve tribes. As well as in 1 Peter where the letter is addressed to the dispersed of Israel scattered through Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia.
These tribes had been dispersed during the Assyrian invasion several hundred years before, but they were now being brought into the fold of Yeshua’s Kingdom.
However, as the good news of the Kingdom grew, so did persecution. Converts of the faith were being imprisoned and even stoned to death for their faith.
One of the dominant figures of the time was a man who had close ties to the Herodian family. His name was Saul of Tarsus, who emerged as a prominent figure in the time following the resurrection. Saul/Paul himself tells us in Romans 16:11 that Herodian, (in Greek meaning Herod) is his kinsman or (family member). We also read in Acts 13:1 about this group of apostles connections with Herod the Tetrarch. Saul was an overseer of many deaths and persecutions of believers that followed the teachings of Yeshua. Many miracles were being manifested by the power of the Holy Spirit as a witness of the Saviour of Israel.
Saul, an agent of the Herodian Sanhedrin claimed a secret conversion on the road to Damascus, one in which he was given a “new revelation” which was very different from the message of the prophets and even different from the message Yeshua gave to his disciples.
Saul, who also went by the name Paul, began to preach a message that aligned more closely with a strange culmination of pharisaical doctrine and an elusive kingdom that was visible in the hearts of believers. He peddled a faith of easy believism and an inclusion of all people. This began the seeds for what would later come to be known as the Catholic (universal) church.
His mission was clear, if he couldn’t destroy the peoples faith by persecution, he would subvert their faith by deception. Paul a prominent member of the Herodian Sanhedrin, feared that the people throughout Judaea and Asia would be empowered by the message of Yeshua’s disciples and would turn the fury of Rome against Jerusalem because people were leaving the pagan temples, becoming circumcised and obeying the Sabbaths and dietary laws. These practices were forbidden by Rome outside of Judaea.
Roman authorities were very wary of Judaea because of former revolts concerning the reclaiming of the temple and Jerusalem during the Maccabean wars a century earlier.
Rome also saw themselves as the enlightened people of the world and viewed all of these practices as barbaric and uneducated. Here are just a couple of quotes from many historical references about Romes aversion to what YHVH commanded Israel.
“Their peculiar distinctions of days, of meats, and a variety of trivial though burdensome observances, were so many objects of disgust and aversion for the other nations, to whose habits and prejudices they were diametrically opposite.”
“At this time also the Jews began a war, because they were forbidden to mutilate their genitals.”
The consul Titus Flavius Clemens was condemned to death by the Roman Senate in 95AD for circumcising himself and converting to the Hebrew faith.
- Non-Judains who began keeping Hebraic customs (like Sabbath, circumcision, and dietary laws) were often viewed suspiciously.
- Roman society saw such behavior as abandoning Roman identity as barbaric or subversive.
- Pressure could come from local authorities, pagan neighbors, and sometimes even family.
To fully understand Paul’s mission, we need to know a little earlier history regarding the power that was given to the Herodian family. Also, see our teaching “Acts” Of Deception.
Herod the first ruled Judaea between 37–4 BC. He was installed as King of Judea by the Roman Senate with the backing of Mark Antony and Octavian (later Augustus Caesar).
Herod owed his position and power entirely to Rome. His kingship was not from the Davidic line but a political appointment, he was Edomite/Idumean by descent. The terms of the Arrangement were that Rome would give Herod power to rule Judea, Galilee, and the surrounding regions as a client king. In return, Herod was expected to:
• Keep the region politically stable
• Collect and deliver taxes to Rome
• Suppress uprisings and keep the people loyal to Caesar
• Promote Roman interests, including loyalty to the emperor
The Herodian dynasty’s survival depended on Roman favor. Any resistance to Rome endangered their rule. They acted as a buffer between Rome and the Judaeans, promoting political compliance while trying to preserve a semblance of local autonomy.
Paul’s teachings encouraged submission to Roman authority as their rulers sent by YHVH, something that completely clashed with Yeshua’s message and that of the law and the prophets, who only spoke of freedom under a separate and set apart Kingdom of YHVH that would crush all earthly power. Paul also emphasized gentile inclusion and an easier path that softened the call to separate from the world’s powers, while the disciples held to Yeshua’s more confrontational message that demanded separation from the oppressive systems of Rome and false religion.
For a fuller exegetical study on the contradictions of Paul’s message see our teaching “An Enemy Has Done This“
The dispersed of Israel scattered throughout Asia Minor did not receive Paul’s teachings, as one of Paul’s final letters; his letter to Timothy reveals:
"This you know, that all they which are in Asia have turned away from me..." 2 Timothy 1:15
In the second chapter of Revelation; this same dispersed of Israel in Asia Minor, that the prophecies of Revelation were written to, were commended with the rejection of the false message that Paul and his apostles were teaching and how they were persecuted. The “Great Bible” translation of 1539 which didn’t contain verses make this clear:
"… you have tested those which say they are apostles, and are not, and you have found them to be liars and have suffered."
This divide led many of the early Christians especially those among the scattered tribes of Israel in Asia Minor—to reject Paul’s teachings in favor of the teachings they had received from Yeshua’s disciples. These disciples had walked with Yeshua, receiving direct revelation from Him about the coming Kingdom of YHVH, and their message was at odds with the political compromises embedded in Paul’s letters.
In the years following Yeshua’s resurrection, many of the lost tribes of Israel that had received the disciples’ teachings fled Roman persecution. The Gauls, who were among the largest groups of the lost tribes, had faced relentless oppression for their faith under Rome. Not only were they persecuted by Rome, but also by the growing Roman Christian Church, which had begun to adopt policies that crushed the true faith of Yeshua. Among these were the enforced view of a pagan trinitarian religion that Rome imposed. In the letters from the Gauls we read how they were tortured and fed to wild beasts because of their faith.
To understand why this view of a triune God was so heavily opposed it is important to know the historical context of this religion.
Synopsis: The Mithraic Infiltration into Roman Christianity
As Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire in the first three centuries, it encountered and absorbed elements of the dominant pagan religious culture—particularly from Mithraism, a popular mystery religion among Roman soldiers and elites. The Church of Rome, seeking to unify the empire under a single religious authority, increasingly adopted familiar Mithraic customs, symbols, and rituals to make Christianity more palatable and acceptable to the Roman populace.
Mithraism, which venerated the sun god Mithras. In Mithraism the worship of the three supreme deities of Isis represented as the morning sun, the all seeing eye of Horus as the sun at high noon, and Set the god of the underworld or setting sun. A trinity of idolatry.
YHVH reiterated throughout the law and prophets that (HE IS) and there is none other beside Him. This does not delineate from the purpose and need for a Savior. The picture Revelation shows us of a lamb that was slain from the foundation of the world is written throughout His Word. But the idea of a “trinitarian godhead” was not only rejected by the Christian Hebrews it was foreign to them.
The religion of the sun in Mithraism led to many other practices such as Sunday worship. The Roman Church integrated these features as it rose in influence, especially after Constantine’s Edict of Milan (313 AD) and the Council of Nicaea (325 AD).
This synthesis of pagan tradition with Christian doctrine led to the creation of rituals, holy days, and theological concepts (such as December 25th as Christ’s birthdate, veneration of saints resembling household gods, and hierarchical priesthood structures) that bore little resemblance to the original Hebraic teachings of Yeshua and his apostles.
Through this strategic adaptation, the Roman Church effectively replaced the earlier, more Hebraic and decentralized Christian movement with an imperial religion built on pagan foundations, securing both spiritual control and political loyalty across the empire.
After heavy persecution, the Gauls, seeking refuge from the oppressive forces of Rome and the corrupted church, fled through the Caucasus Mountains and into Europe. They settled in the northern and western parts of the continent, where they would eventually establish kingdoms that were free from Roman domination. Yeshua’s message, passed down by His disciples, continued to guide them, as they held fast to the Kingdom of YHVH and righteousness.
But the Roman Empire was relentless, and by around 400 AD, Rome returned to Europe with its military forces. The Gauls once again faced a formidable threat. But this time, the Gauls fought back, and in an incredible turn of events, they defeated the Romans. They established new strongholds in what would later become the British Isles, Ireland, and Scotland—lands where they would live in freedom for centuries, continuing to resist the ever-growing power of Rome.
Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, the papacy found itself politically exposed and militarily weak, caught between the declining power of Byzantium and the rising threat of barbarian kingdoms, particularly the Lombards in Italy. In this power vacuum, the bishops of Rome gradually assumed not only spiritual but also civic responsibilities, evolving into temporal leaders of the city and surrounding regions.
In the 6th and 7th centuries, the Papacy faced a divided spiritual landscape in the former territories of the Western Roman Empire. Pope Gregory I (r. 590–604) inherited a Church whose influence was confined and contested—not only by non-Christian pagans, but also by powerful Christian kingdoms that did not submit to Roman authority. Among these were the Visigoths and Ostrogoths, who adhered to a non trinitarian Christianity and preserved an identity distinct from Roman orthodoxy. These Gothic peoples, descendants of the northern tribes of Israel, had migrated through Asia Minor and into Europe, maintaining a unique cultural and spiritual legacy apart from the Roman world.
Their monotheistic beliefs—rejecting the Nicene doctrine of the Trinity—reflected early theological Semitic doctrine of monotheism than to the evolving Greco-Roman theology of the institutional Church. The Papacy viewed this not just as heresy, but as a direct challenge to its spiritual authority. The existence of powerful Christian kingdoms operating outside of Rome’s doctrinal and political control was unacceptable to a Church seeking universal supremacy.
To counter this, Gregory implemented a two-pronged strategy: the suppression of monotheistic Christianity, and the Paganization of Catholic Christianity to expand its appeal and absorb the broader population of pagan Europeans.
Gregory issued clear instructions to his missionaries—most notably in his correspondence with Augustine of Canterbury—not to destroy pagan temples or outlaw their festivals, but to repurpose and baptize them. Pagan temples were to be converted into churches; traditional feasts were to be preserved but renamed in honor of Christian saints. This blending of beliefs made the transition to Roman Christianity smoother, ensuring less resistance and faster consolidation of papal influence. In effect, the Church adopted pagan structure and symbolism—saint veneration, holy days aligned with solstice festivals, relic worship, and hierarchical priesthood—as part of its institutional design.
At the same time, Gregory looked to the Franks as a military and religious ally. Having adopted Trinitarian Christianity under Clovis I, the Franks were not only doctrinally aligned with Rome but politically ambitious. Gregory cultivated this alliance, encouraging Frankish expansion and using their armies as a weapon to suppress the Celtic Christian kingdom. This alliance laid the groundwork for what would become the Holy Roman Empire under Charlemagne, whose imperial authority rested on papal coronation and doctrinal unity.
Together, these efforts—the co-opting of paganism, the targeting of non-Trinitarian Christians, and the empowerment of Frankish rulers—enabled the Papacy to reassert dominance over Western Europe. Yet beneath the theological language was a deeper objective: the elimination of competing spiritual lineages, especially those tied to the house of Israel through the Gothic tribes, and the establishment of a Roman-centered Christian empire with the Papacy at its head.
This alliance solidified in the 8th century when Pope Stephen II, facing renewed Lombard aggression and abandoned by the Byzantines, crossed the Alps to anoint Pepin the Short as king, receiving in return the donation of Pepin, which granted the Papal States to the Church. This marked a turning point: the Pope had now sanctioned a Frankish king’s legitimacy, while the Franks had assumed the role of defenders of Rome.
The culmination came in 800AD, when Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans—a profound moment that symbolically transferred imperial authority from Constantinople to the West. This coronation was not merely ceremonial; it was a deliberate act of reconstituting Roman imperial identity through the Church, positioning the Papacy as the source of political legitimacy.
Thus, the Frankish–Papal alliance served dual goals: for the Papacy, it was a way to reclaim authority over the Christian West and escape Byzantine domination; for the Franks, it legitimized their expanding empire and sanctified their rule. Together, they laid the groundwork for the medieval synthesis of Church and State that would define Latin Christendom for centuries to come.
Although the papacy was successful in converting parts of Europe there was still a strong resistance to the doctrines and rule of Rome.
Around the 11th century, everything changed for the non Catholic Christian’s by the Frankish (Norman) Invasion of England which was lead by “William the Conqueror”. This event was a pivotal moment in the history of both the Gauls in England and their faith, as the Normans sought to bring England under the centralized control of the Roman Catholic Church.
After the Norman Conquest, William the Conqueror promised to reform the English Church and bring it into closer alignment with Roman practices, including the suppression of heretical movements like the Sabbatarians. By doing so, he would not only consolidate his own power but also help ensure that the English Church was loyal to the papacy, which had supported his claim to the throne.
The Normans imposed a system of feudalism in England, a hierarchical system that consolidated power and wealth in the hands of the monarchy and the Church. The Norman Invasion was not just a political conquest; it was a spiritual conquest that enforced the control of the Roman Catholic Church over the English people, just as Rome had sought to control Israel in the time of Yeshua.
This system of feudalism created a society where the common people were subjugated to the control of the elite, with the Catholic Church playing a central role in maintaining this order. The Church, through its alliance with the monarchs, continued to enforce Roman influence, and the people of YHVH—those who held to the teachings of Yeshua—were once again faced with oppression and persecution. The Roman Catholic Church would continue to be a driving force of political and religious control, much as it had been in Rome’s earlier imperial days.
Four hundred years later during the Protestant Reformation which was the beginning of casting off the shackles of Satan once again, began to take place. This movement was a direct challenge to the Catholic Church—a system that, over the centuries, had morphed into an imperial power, wielding authority over kings and nations. What began by protests by pointing out errors in Catholic doctrine led to a complete separation from the Catholic Church. This began a very bloody era of history through many wars across Europe and eventually this led to what was known as the Catholic inquisitions, which had sought to root out any who dared to challenge the Papal authority, using violence and intimidation to suppress the Reformation. But the true message of Yeshua of the coming Kingdom, of freedom from tyranny and oppression—had already begun to spread beyond the grasp of Rome. The Gauls, now dispersed throughout Europe, found themselves in the middle of this seismic shift.
The Jesuit Order, known as the “Society of Jesus“ founded by Ignatius of Loyola a Catholic Jew in the 16th century, would play a key role in countering the Reformation. The Jesuits were sent on missions to infiltrate Protestant strongholds and suppress the spread of Reformation ideas. This dark period in history would see many burned at the stake, tortured, and driven from their homes in a desperate attempt to hold on to the ancient imperial power of Rome.
But despite the persecution, despite the rise of Rome’s modern-day empire, the spirit of hope and a renewed faith continued to grow.
But the journey didn’t end there. The Israelites, now living in the lands of Europe, continued to face persecution under King James and the Church of England—forces heavily influenced by Rome and its long-standing imperial rule. As we know, the Church of England was essentially born from the split with Rome but still carried many of the same doctrines and traditions that oppressed the people.
The Puritans, descendants of the lost tribes, were particularly persecuted because they were determined to live according to the commands of scripture—separate from the world, separate from the false religious systems that had plagued them for centuries. These people were not simply dissenters; they were devout followers of the commandments of YHVH and they also carried the testimony of regeneration through the sacrifice of Yeshua, in the way that the Scriptures outlined. Their journey was spiritual as much as it was physical.
Fleeing the Church of England’s oppressive rule, some of which required strict church attendance or indefinite imprisonment after the third offense. The righteous remnants of Israel took to the seas, journeying across the ocean in search of a land where they could worship freely. That land would come to be known as America.
For the Puritans, the New World held the promise of a fresh start, a place where they could be free from the heavy hand of Rome’s influence and the English monarchy. It was in this new land that they found renewed hope. Hope not only for freedom of worship but also for the opportunity to build a society that could be devoted to living out the Kingdom of YHVH in truth and peace—without the interference of the false religion of Rome.
Although the days of the inquisition were several hundred years ago, and for a time Rome lost its control over most of Europe. However, today we now see the rising head of this final beast we were warned of in Revelation. As we look around the world, we see the ancient powers of Rome rising again.
We see the carefully crafted culmination of church and state. We see the Catholic Churches religious formation in the—at one time, Protestant churches. We see the false teachings of antinomianism which is almost paramount no matter the Christian denomination (or non denominational) affiliation. We see many similar sacraments (religous practices) that mirror the Catholic Church. We see titles and doctorates that are esteemed as a mark of godliness. We see the celebrations and merriments of pagan festivals that point right back to the same evil institution that parades itself as holy.
The Roman symbolism is alive and well in many of today’s government buildings and institutions. Let’s take a closer look at the final head of the beast in Revelation and the harlot that is riding it. The Roman Empire is often remembered for its grand architecture, military conquests, and remarkable engineering feats. But it’s true legacy lies in the systems of governance it created, which continue to shape the world today. The very foundation of modern democracy, law, and civil society draws much from Rome’s ancient establishment. Take, for example, the idea of republicanism. The Roman Republic was one of the first political systems to implement a form of representative government, with the Senate serving as a model for legislative bodies worldwide. That’s right, even the U.S. Senate is after the design of the Roman system of representation of the people. Hence the old system of supposed elected officials who represent the people, checks and balances within the system. Even the concept of a written constitution, all trace their roots to ancient Rome.
Then there’s Roman law, which laid the groundwork for much of Western legal systems. Latin terms like habeas corpus, subpoena, and pro bono are used daily in courts across the United States, and these are direct legacies of Roman legal principles. The concept of civil law, particularly, was handed down through the centuries, shaping everything from property rights to criminal justice.
But what about symbols? Are we really so far removed from ancient Rome, or are we still wearing the emperor’s crown, so to speak?
Let’s talk about symbols. The Romans were masterful at using iconography to project power, unity, and control.
The fascia symbology in Washington, D.C., is tied to the use of ancient Roman imagery, specifically symbols related to power, authority, and governance. The “fasces” is an ancient Roman symbol of strength and unity, representing a bundle of rods tied together with an axe at the center. This symbol was used by Roman magistrates to signify their authority and their ability to enforce the law. The fasces were carried by attendants known as lictors who accompanied Roman officials, particularly consuls, as a display of their power to both punish and protect. Today, this same symbology of the fasces can be found in several locations throughout Washington, D.C., most notably in the architecture and iconography associated with the U.S. government. The symbolism is most evident in the design of public buildings, monuments, and some federal government emblems. Such as the Lincoln Memorial, the U.S. Senate, and the Great Seal of the United States. The fasces, along with other Roman symbols, are found throughout the design of Washington, D.C. Another iconic symbol of America is the eagle. The *Aquila*, the Roman military standard, was the eagle—an emblem of Roman might and dominance. Today, the eagle still dominates the seal of the United States, its wings spread wide as a symbol of power and strength. The U.S. Capitol itself, the seat of the federal government, mirrors the grandiosity of ancient Roman architecture. Its columns, domed roofs, and use of symmetry are directly influenced by Roman designs meant to invoke the perception of power and dominance.
Even the very design of Washington, D.C., with its grand avenues, monuments, and the all-seeing eye atop the Capitol Dome, is reminiscent of Roman imperial design. And let’s not forget the obelisk. The famous Washington Monument is an American obelisk, a direct nod to Rome’s use of the towering stone pillars, originally imported from Egypt, to symbolize enduring power.
Now let’s take a look at prophecies concerning the Whore of Babylon. The Bible, particularly the Book of Revelation, speaks of a final, apocalyptic world order that will rise from the ashes of past empires. This empire is often associated with the imagery of a beast with seven heads and ten horns on the final head. A creature that embodies ultimate power and evil. Revelation even mentions a “Whore of Babylon” who sits atop this beast and holds sway over the nations. America is the Whore of Babylon, which is a metaphorical reference to a nation that not only plays a pivotal, controlling role in world affairs, but also is a nation that was dedicated to the truth of scripture and dedication to their Elohim, but now has played the harlot with the surrounding nations and has worked to bring about this final empire in the last days.
The U.S. is a superpower that has influenced global politics, economics, and military actions for over a century. In the Bible the apocalyptic imagery in Revelation, shows Babylon, a city of wealth, excess, and spiritual decay, a perfect parallel to modern America’s consumer-driven society, with its global military presence and cultural exports.
Revelation 13 tells us the appearance of this final beast which points us back to Daniel chapter 7. It reveals the likeness of this beast is like a leopard with feet like a bear and the mouth of a lion. We see these represent the culmination of the great cities of the earth that have ruled over Israel until the final beast is destroyed. This final beast also that is spoken of in Daniel is an all-encompassing empire that unites the world under a singular rule, and that’s where the connection to the Roman Empire resurfaces. We are beginning to see a global empire that mirrors the Roman imperial order of the past.
Consider the current state of global politics and economics. Borders are being redefined, not just through war or conquest, but through international agreements, trade deals, and the push for a more connected world. Think about the ongoing efforts to create a global currency. The idea of a universal currency—something akin to the ancient Roman *denarius*—is not so far-fetched. We already see this movement in the form of digital currencies like the euro, and even proposals for a unified global financial system that could reduce the power of individual nations’ currencies.
The European Union, in many ways, acts as the first major step toward a reborn Roman Empire. It’s a union of nations, much like Rome’s conquered territories once were, seeking unity in the name of economic stability and security. And then, of course, there’s the UN, the IMF, and other international organizations that strive for global governance, where laws and economic systems are becoming less localized and more universal.
But where does America fit into this grand picture? America, as the world’s current superpower, has been guiding much of this change. The U.S. military presence around the world, the economic policies it enforces, and its cultural dominance make it the “guiding force” of the New World Order—a force that is steering the world toward a new imperial system. It’s no wonder that some view the U.S. as the modern incarnation of the Roman Empire, with Washington, D.C., as its imperial seat.
As the world moves toward greater economic and political integration, the dream of a one-world government, controlled by a few central powers, is becoming increasingly real. And who is leading this charge? America. The very nation that’s often symbolized by the eagle, the same eagle that once flew over the Roman legions.
We need to examine a very important aspect of the final beast in Daniel chapter 2 and 7 and Revelation 13. And that characteristic are the ten horns of the beast.
Daniel 7:7-8 In Daniel’s vision of the four beasts, the fourth beast has ten horns. These ten horns represent ten kingdoms or nations that will arise in the future for the final kingdom that humbles the nations under their authority. The ten horns symbolize a coalition of nations that will align in the end times, led by a powerful ruler (the “little horn,” commonly associated with the Antichrist).
These ten horns will give their power to the Beast, forming a coalition in the last days. The ten horns in both Daniel and Revelation are symbolic of ten nations or regions that will form part of a revived empire in the last days, as more of the picture begins to take shape let’s take a look at the fall of the Ottoman Empire .
The Ottoman Empire (1299–1922) controlled vast territories in the Middle East, North Africa, and Southeastern Europe.
With the fall of the Ottoman Empire following World War I and the establishment of the Republic of Turkey, the legacy of the Ottomans still influences modern geopolitics in the region.
Turkey is a potential leader of a revived Ottoman Caliphate or Islamic confederacy. Under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey has sought to reassert its regional power and influence, particularly in the Middle East. Turkey’s increasing influence in the Middle East and its efforts to unite Muslim-majority countries, as well as its strategic positioning at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, makes it a potential leader of a ten-nation coalition in the prophecy.
There are calls within many parts of the Muslim world for the return of a Caliphate, which would be a unified political and religious system, replacing national boundaries.
Here are some quotes by Islamic leaders regarding this desire:
“The Islamic world has been waiting for the restoration of the caliphate for years. The Ottoman Empire was the last caliphate, and we must not forget that.” Erdoğan
“The Caliphate is a symbol of unity for the Muslim world, and its loss has fragmented the Ummah. We must reclaim it to restore strength and solidarity.” Abdulhamid II
“The restoration of the Caliphate is not merely a historical necessity but a divine imperative. Only through the Caliphate can we return to the true path of Islam.” Sayyid Qutb
“The Caliphate is the only legitimate system of governance for Muslims. The Ottoman Empire’s collapse is the root of our disunity and weakness.” Al-Qaeda
“The revival of the Caliphate is the key to solving the problems facing the Muslim Ummah today. We reject all Western-imposed borders and secular states.” Hizb-ut-Tahrir
“The Caliphate is the only system capable of uniting the Muslim world under one banner, as it was under the Ottomans. This unity is essential to facing the challenges imposed by the West.” Al-Maqdisi
There is a very real and strong desire to see this Unity take place especially as their lands are destroyed as the west takes more and more control. The borders of the west have been opened to allow for a strong Islamic presence in the west.
The ten-nation confederacy will be formed around a revived Islamic Caliphate.
In Daniel chapter 2 we are told that the toes of clay will not mix with the iron. In revelation 17:16 we are told that these same ten horns/toes will hate the whore and burn her with fire. This is because they are only given power as rulers for a time to destroy the remnants of Israel, as (the sword of the beast). In Islamic law the punishment for idolatry (the worship of Yeshua) is death by beheading which takes us to the fifth seal of Revelation 6.
America, the Whore of Babylon, stands poised to guide the world toward a new imperial order. Guiding the final Beast that will dominate the earth, bringing nations together under a single banner. The Roman Catholic Church still wields immense spiritual and political power. The United States, with its deep roots in Roman ideals, continues to exert global influence. It is no longer a question of if the final beast system, as prophesied in Daniel 7 and Revelation, is rising—it is here.
The prophecies of Revelation point to a final world system—a one-world government, a one-world religion, and a one-world currency.
There is a phrase which encapsulates what this beast agenda has been. This was painted on a canvas which portrayed two hands coming out of the clouds with an open scroll with these words written on the scroll in Latin:
“Damnant quod non intellegunt, divide et impera in dextra pro rege, lege et populo, novus ordo seclorum.”
Translation:
“They condemn what they do not understand, divide and rule on the right hand for the king, the law, and the people, a new order of the ages.”
—
Breakdown and Critical Analysis:
1. “Damnant quod non intellegunt” – “They condemn what they do not understand.”
– This part of the phrase perfectly encapsulates the Catholic Church’s reaction to the rising tide of Protestantism during the Reformation. When societies or governments, particularly Protestant ones, denounced the Church’s right to rule based on divine authority, the Catholic Church was forced to act.
The Church’s authority was built on the notion that it was the divinely appointed ruler of the people. Any challenge to this power was not just a religious disagreement, but a direct threat to the very structure of society itself.
The Protestants and other secular governments that rejected papal supremacy were condemned not for doctrinal differences, but because they denied the Catholic Church’s claim to divine rule over not just the church but the secular world.
– Historical Example: The Catholic response to the Protestant Reformation was to condemn not just the ideas of reformers like Martin Luther, but to condemn entire nations and rulers who followed these new ideas. The Pope’s excommunication of Protestant monarchs and the Jesuit influence in infiltrating Protestant governments are just two examples of the Church’s intense efforts to maintain its divine right to rule.
2. “Divide et impera” – “Divide and rule”
– The Catholic Church’s response to these threats was to divide and rule. This was not a new tactic; it was a time-honored strategy used to weaken and control societies. By exploiting political divisions within Protestant governments and sowing discord between rulers and subjects, the Church ensured that the populace could be manipulated into submission. This method created the perfect conditions for infiltration, where the Church could position itself as the ultimate authority that could mediate between warring factions and guarantee stability.
– Historical Source: The Jesuit order played a key role in the Church’s manipulative strategy, infiltrating Protestant governments and working within secret societies to influence political decisions. The Thirty Years’ War, which saw Catholics and Protestants fighting across Europe, was an opportunity for the Catholic Church to weaken Protestant nations and reassert its dominance. The Church navigated both sides, fostering division, while secretly working to ensure the eventual Catholic victory in these lands.
3. “In dextra pro rege, lege et populo” – “On the right hand for the king, the law, and the people”
– The phrase “on the right hand” speaks directly to the divine authority that the Church claimed over both secular and spiritual matters. The Church’s strategy was simple: align itself with the king and the law, ensuring that rulers would recognize the Church’s authority in exchange for political control. By positioning the Pope as the ultimate spiritual authority, the Church ensured that kings, bishops, and common people were all subordinated to its divine power. This created a hierarchical system where any secular power was always under the thumb of the Church—whether in direct governance or through puppet rulers installed by the Church.
– Historical Source: A glaring example of this is the relationship between the Pope and the monarchs of Catholic nations. King Philip II of Spain, for example, bowed to papal authority in order to strengthen his rule over his kingdom, as the Church presented itself as the guarantor of political stability. Likewise, Catholic kings in countries like France and Portugal were willing to fight against Protestant rulers and compromise the independence of their governments to maintain their relationship with the Papal authority. The Papal Bull and excommunication were regular tools used to ensure kings were never truly independent of Rome.
4. “Novus ordo seclorum” – “A new order of the ages”
– Here, we see the vision of the Catholic Church for the future—a new world order where the Church would rule supreme. This new order would ensure that all rulers, laws, and people were firmly in line with Catholicism. It is a world where the ends justify the means, and where moral or ethical considerations take a backseat to the Church’s goals of political and spiritual dominance. This idea would manifest in infiltrating governments, controlling laws, and manipulating the masses into obedience, ensuring the Church’s authority was never questioned.
– Historical Example: The Spanish Inquisition represents the embodiment of this new order, where the Church would use its spiritual authority to target anyone who stood in its way, including not only heretics but also entire nations that threatened its power. This new order was not one of tolerance or inclusivity, but of absolute control, where any challenge to the Church’s rule would be crushed through manipulation, coercion, and the destruction of political stability in Protestant or secular realms.
—
Conclusion:
The phrase “Damnant quod non intellegunt, divide et impera in dextra pro rege, lege et populo, novus ordo seclorum” is a striking description of how the Catholic Church, in its zeal for maintaining absolute power, used manipulative tactics to infiltrate and control both governments and societies. The Church’s actions were not driven by mere religious fervor but by an unwavering desire to maintain its divine authority over the secular world, even at the cost of human lives, societal division, and the subjugation of nations.
– “Damnant quod non intellegunt” refers to the Catholic Church condemning those who rejected its divine right to rule, whether it was Protestant nations or governments that no longer adhered to papal supremacy.
– “Divide et impera” highlights the Church’s use of division to weaken Protestant rulers and nations, creating opportunities for Catholic control to reassert itself.
– “In dextra pro rege, lege et populo” reveals the Church’s strategic positioning as the ultimate arbiter of power, ensuring kings and laws were always aligned with Papal authority.
– “Novus ordo seclorum” envisions the Catholic Church’s new world order, one where the ends justify the means, and the Church is the sole master over both the spiritual and secular realms.
This analysis, though blunt and uncompromising, demonstrates the Catholic Church’s historical reliance on manipulative strategies to secure its control over nations and people. The Church’s claims of divine authority were not simply spiritual beliefs but political tools, used to create a world order where it could wield ultimate power. The idea that “the ends justify the means”—whether through manipulation, coercion, or even warfare—was the guiding principle behind the Church’s relentless pursuit of dominion over the world.
The lost tribes of Israel, (the Gauls, the Protestant Reformers, and the Christians who endured the Inquisition) all point to one truth: Yeshua’s Kingdom is not of this world. His return will bring an end to this imperial system, and the Kingdom of YHVH will be established.
As we reflect on the rise and fall of the Beast—an empire of control and domination, rooted in both ancient Rome and the forces that shape the modern world—there is a deeper, more hopeful prophecy that beckons us toward a different future. The Book of Revelation paints a vivid picture not just of a world ruled by tyranny and the ambition of the Beast, but of the ultimate fulfillment of YHVH’s Kingdom on Earth, led by Yeshua (Jesus), the Messiah.
This future kingdom, foretold in Scripture, is not one of oppression and subjugation but of peace, justice, and divine authority. When the Beast—the symbol of earthly, corrupt power—is finally destroyed, it will pave the way for the establishment of Yeshua’s eternal reign. This Kingdom will not be built on the fleeting empires of mankind, but on the foundations of righteousness and truth.
In Revelation 19, we see Yeshua returning as a victorious King, riding on a white horse, his eyes blazing with justice. The Beast and its false prophet are cast into the lake of fire, symbolizing the end of human pride, greed, and corruption that have driven empires throughout history. This is the fulfillment of YHVH’s promise to establish His Kingdom on Earth. It is a Kingdom that transcends all earthly nations, breaking the borders and boundaries that have divided humanity for millennia.
The destruction of the Beast represents the fall of all systems of corruption, and idolatry, making way for a Coming Kingdom ruled by the Messiah. As Revelation 21:1-4 promises, there will be “a new heaven and a new earth,” where the Elohim of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob will dwell among His people, wiping away every tear, ending death, mourning, crying, and pain. It is a restoration of the world that was lost in the Garden of Eden, a return to harmony between YHVH, humanity, and creation.
This Kingdom will be a literal, physical reign on earth, not a metaphorical idea or distant hope, but a present reality where YHVH’s will is “done on earth as it is in heaven.” The promise of peace and justice will no longer be elusive. In this Kingdom, the righteous will be exalted, the poor will be comforted, and every injustice will be made right. Yeshua will reign with perfect wisdom, grace, and power, bringing fulfillment to the promises made to the patriarchs, prophets, and the saints.
As we see the world seemingly moving toward the rise of the Beast, this knowledge should remind us that we are not without hope. The Kingdom of YHVH on this earth is the final victory in HIS-story. It will transcend all empires, all political systems, and all forces of darkness. When the Beast is destroyed, Yeshua will set up His Kingdom, and this will mark the beginning of an era of peace and justice, where YHVH’s will is fully realized on earth.
This hope should not lead us to despair or fear, but to anticipation and perseverance. No matter how powerful the forces of evil may seem, they are ultimately doomed to fall. In the end, it is the kingdom of Yeshua—righteous, eternal, and just—that will stand forever, a beacon of light in a world that has long been shadowed by darkness.
So, as we navigate through these tumultuous times, let us remember that while the Beast may rise, it is the Kingdom of Yeshua that will reign supreme. And this is the fulfillment of YHVH’s promise: that His Kingdom will come, and His will shall be done, on earth as it is in heaven. We can trust in that ultimate victory and live with the assurance that YHVH’s plan is unfolding, even as we see the world shift in ways we may not fully understand.
Thank you for joining me on this journey today. As we’ve seen, history is not just a series of disconnected events. It is a testimony to the faithfulness of YHVH’s promises and the way His word shapes the world around us. The prophecies of the lost tribes of Israel, the Protestant Reformation, and the rise of Rome, they are all pieces of a much larger puzzle, one that points to the return of Yeshua and the ultimate victory of the Kingdom of YHVH.
Until next time, keep seeking the truth, and remember, the Kingdom of YHVH is nearer than you think.
2 thoughts on “The Kingdom of YHVH, the Beast, and the Final Conflict”